- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Elliot
- Kyle
- Lance
- Nick
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- Andy
- JRoss
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Lance
- Nick
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- Andy
- JRoss
- Elliot
Nick claims Michael Brantley
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Lance
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- Andy
- JRoss
- Elliot
- Nick
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Lance
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- JRoss
- Elliot
- Nick
- Andy
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Lance
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- JRoss
- Nick
- Andy
- Elliot
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- JRoss
- Nick
- Andy
- Elliot
- Lance
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- JRoss
- Andy
- Elliot
- Lance
- Nick
- Ted
- Matt
- Eric
- Markham
- Steve
- Kyle
- Bick
- Connor
- Zach
- JRoss
- Lance
- Nick
- Andy
- Elliot
1 comment:
I was not interested in any of the other players on waivers other than Rauch.
If Rauch had not been available, I would have waited until the players hit the FA pool. Since I did use a waiver claim on Rauch (and figured I would get him), I decided to throw in another claim for Lewis as well. This is why I want to know if anyone else had a claim on Lewis - if someone did, I will happily revert back to the 11th waiver priority. Otherwise, I think this set-up is fair.
Post a Comment